🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned order, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Texas to implement a newly configured congressional map that is projected to include up to five new GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 order, handed down on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to overturn a lower court's injunction that had rejected the new map in November.

Court's Reasoning

The district court erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, creating significant confusion and upsetting the delicate equilibrium in elections, the justices wrote in explaining its action.

The district court had previously found that Texas had probably grouped voters by their race – a act known as racial gerrymandering – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had mandated the state to use the districts created after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Stinging Dissent

With a strongly worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's action. She contended that it undermined the work of the district court, observing that its opinion was actually authored by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan stated in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, The majority's order solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its boosted political tilt, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

National Map-Drawing Fight

The court's action occurs during a countrywide battle over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in efforts to reshape the U.S. House map to bolster a fragile Republican majority. Typically, map-drawing takes place after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a series of events among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that could add a number of more conservative seats. The opposition, in response, have responded with new maps in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State attorney general hailed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's prerogative to draw a map that secures representation supportive of the GOP. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

In contrast, Democratic representatives decried the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the chair of a major party election organization.

A leading House leader argued the court had once again damaged its legitimacy by approving a racially gerrymandered map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he stated.